(September 26) The structures cybernetic Iranian nuclear plants have been invaded by a virus to which U.S. intelligence agencies give the name of Stuxnet. If Israel attacks, this would explain the strange silence maintained for some time now by the Israeli authorities with respect to the so-called 'existential threat' Israel accounted for by a nuclear Iran, but that in the past it was reported in every pie 'turn.
The news of the epidemic covering all computer networks in Iran, but especially those of use in nuclear power, has been launched by the Iranian semi-official Mehr and resume by the New York Times. The source is the Iranian Ministry that handles the atomic plant at Natanz and the many other structures, known or secret, involved in Iran's nuclear program. The announcement tends to minimize the effect of the infection and not advance hypotheses on its origin for now, but if Tehran is powerless to defend himself or retaliate, you may prefer not to dramatize.
According to the comments of the "intelligence" in Washington, aggression and technical sophistication of the epidemic fanno ritenere pressochè certo che l’autore sia uno stato e non un’organizzazione privata. Stuxnet – la cui esistenza in forma meno complessa era nota da tempo – ha la capacità di autoriprodursi e attaccare le reti cibernetiche anche quanto sono spente. Se, applicando il principio del “cui prodest”, si ipotizza che l’invasione proviene Israele, ne segue una folla di interrogativi come: lo sapevano gli Stati Uniti? Hanno dato la loro collaborazione? Che natura ha un attacco di questo genere dal punto di vista del diritto internazionale?
0 comments:
Post a Comment