(Nov. 8) four days ago to celebrate the fifteenth anniversary of the death of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, former President Clinton has published an extensive article in which he moved and, after commemorating the figure of only the character of the Israeli government that has ever really fought hard to make peace with the Palestinians, killed in cold blood by a terrorist of the Israeli right, says there are now indiscriminately all the requirements needed to achieve the dream of Rabin, which is peace , and enumerates them carefully, one one. At the end of that list, however, Clinton does not say that this peace achievable so obviously has a flaw: no.
Moreover, the same Clinton still totally optimistic after his diagnosis of the situation to succumb to a mysterious silence, because it does not have even the slightest, and even timid, even in part because of assumptions about this nonsense so blatant: a peace that exists in theory but in practice no. Neither is even remotely close to being there. One possibility for example would jump in the eyes of Clinton, since he is celebrating a man of peace and in doing so points out that he was made out to gunshots by an extremist right-wing Israeli precisely for his efforts in pro peace, it would be to suppose that peace is still made inaccessible by the Israeli right. But Clinton is so cautious not to dare, ohibò, to propose anything.
But what others say, American commentators? Even there, not even a breath. In addition to their matches to the corresponding note that Israel, which is the icon in the historical narrative of Israel, the figure of Rabin in recent years has gradually faded, and now those who celebrate the anniversary of his death are less and less, and that the values \u200b\u200brepresented by Rabin weigh less and less in the consciousness of the community. The corresponding the Christian Science Monitor to Israel stresses that, for example, the historic Jewish political party of the Left, the Labour Party, of which Rabin was one of the last great exponents, has gone from controlling the time of Rabin third of the Israeli parliament, to control ten percent. In fact, the left has today, in Israel, less than nothing. The only other heir to the Labour Party, the chairman of the state, Shimon Peres, has no voice and he has written that in order not to lose the long black car of the Israeli government would be ready to prostitute not only himself but also his old grandmother.
Other Israeli commentators explain that the dominance of the final right and the opponents of peace seems to be assured that substantial part of the Jewish population, at least 300,000 people, which has already been permanently installed in areas inhabited by Palestinians, which in theory they should be returned to any peace agreement, and both the security that the Israelis seem to finally enjoy by virtue of the rulers of the wall erected to protect them right on the edge of the area inhabited by Palestinians, as well as from the same cage in which the right has managed to imprison the population of Gaza, the elements active resistance.
Well, that icon now actually reflects the values \u200b\u200bof the Palestinian people is no longer Rabin, the murdered dead, but if anything is Ariel Sharon, who died of a stroke that is lying in coma in the most perfect indifference and immobility, a state almost symbolizing what prevails today in Israel: Sharon the "butcher" man recognized by the UN guilty of genocide for the slaughter of men, women and children in the Palestinian camps of Sabra and Shatila, and the man, finally, which was due in part to the conception and practice in the implementation of strategy and the wall of the cage, with which the Arab people of Palestine has been permanently reduced to a helpless state of bondage.
Che dire, poi, dello stato di paralisi quasi equivalente in cui è caduta anche l’amministrazione del presidente Obama, cioè la nazione senza il cui appoggio e aiuto Israele difficilmente potrebbe continuare a realizzare la sua politica di apartheid e di illegalità internazionale? Dire che il povero Obama, che aveva presentato al mondo iniziative di pace in Palestina tanto coraggiose, è bloccato dalle stesse forze misteriose che hanno costretto al mutismo nel suo articolo il suo predecessore democratico, Clinton, è un altro di quei tabù della vita politica americana - il cosiddetto fenomeno dell’elefante nel salotto - la cui presenza da nessuno vuole essere riconosciuta.
E’ lecito fare invece l’ipotesi che non solo l’ importante “lobby” del fondamentalismo ebraico americano, una organizzazione di cui è stata ad abbondanza dimostrata la forza politica, ma lo stesso Congresso americano, alla cui approvazione ogni realizzazione di Obama è subordinata, siano tra le forze che azzerano qualunque conato di pace dell’attuale presidente americano. Clinton nel suo articolo non ha neppure menzionato questo singolare colore ebraico del Congresso americano, un carattere tanto più evidente, in quanto le elezioni per il rinnovo di buona parte del Congresso erano avvenute solo due giorni prima del suo articolo, e i loro risultati avevano ancor più marcato la detta colorazione.
In America, in fact, the results of the "mid-term elections" have been analyzed in more depth and comprehensive, so you learned how many of the new members of Congress and among the new governors of those states are right and the left How many blacks and many whites, how many men and many women, how many homo-and heterosexuals, many lawyers and many businessmen and so on. But how many Jews or those who are pro-Jewish, whose victorious campaigns had been financed by lobbying Israeli-American linked to the right of Israel, no one has found it necessary, or feasible, to go and see and say. The
Israel's growing strength in the new Congress, however, is strangely discussed in Israel, where usually you have more courage to talk openly about things than it has in the United States. It was, for example, openly and enthusiastically proclaimed by a member of the wing of the extreme right-wing party Likud, (it belongs to Prime Minister Netanyahu), Danny Danon, who said: "A huge influx of new members of the House and U.S. Senate in Washington [determined by this election], includes dozens of close friends who will put stop to Israel always dubious and sometimes dangerous, Obama's policy initiatives set out in the first two years of his presidency. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment